Skip to content
All comparisons
Compare

RPC Fast vs shredstream.sh

RPC Fast's unpublished commercial terms require a measured packet race against a fixed-price Frankfurt source on the production host.

us

$100 / month

One destination, 30 days, raw UDP, Frankfurt

RPC Fast

not published

not published

read not published from not published

A fast name is not a benchmark

Latency marketing often collapses several different clocks into one adjective. A packet can reach an edge, enter a socket, complete shred recovery, become a decoded transaction, pass a filter, and trigger application code. Each timestamp answers a different question. Without the event, host, sample set, and percentile definition, the word fast cannot rank two services.

RPC Fast provides shred-derived gRPC inside a broader Solana RPC stack. shredstream.sh sends original Frankfurt shreds through UDP. One exposes processed application material while the other begins at packet ingress. Compare them at a common application milestone rather than equating an upstream raw packet with a downstream filtered event.

Our argument is measurable. A buyer operating in or near Frankfurt can place one $100 feed beside the production process and own every timestamp after ingress. That direct input keeps source and consumer in the same metro while the team controls the remaining latency budget.

Define the finish line before timing anything

Start with the action the software must take. Perhaps it needs a transaction signature, an account touch, a program instruction, or a complete entry. Describe the minimum information required and the final function that receives it. That point becomes the finish line for both paths.

The start line also needs a definition. Customer-side comparisons usually begin when bytes arrive at the tested machine because neither vendor exposes a shared upstream clock. Use a monotonic local clock. Keep clock calls close to socket or stream delivery. Avoid wall-clock timestamps from separate hosts unless synchronization error is measured.

Write the success rule before opening either feed. Include the percentage of useful events observed, the median difference, important tail percentiles, and a maximum tolerable stale interval. State how missing events enter the analysis. A service should not improve its score merely by omitting the hard samples.

This method turns low latency into a falsifiable claim. It also exposes whether the buyer values first bytes or completed decisions.

Two products expose different moments

RPC Fast is listed here as shred-derived gRPC within JSON-RPC, WebSocket, Yellowstone gRPC, and other managed interfaces. It publishes decoded, filterable transaction delivery inside that wider stack.

shredstream.sh stops much earlier. It sends datagrams to the customer's exact nominated public UDP endpoint. No server-side decoder produces transactions. No filter reduces the stream. The receiver must group data and coding shreds, recover what it can, reconstruct entries, and parse relevant content.

That extra customer work is not a hidden add-on. It is the product boundary. Teams with a tuned decoder gain control over scheduling, memory, filtering, and the first actionable path. Teams without that software face real engineering cost. A managed gRPC interface may reach their application sooner even if raw bytes arrived later.

Compare equal outcomes. Product boundaries explain the result, but they must not distort the stopwatch.

Frankfurt creates a falsifiable claim

Our focused origin is Frankfurt. A nearby receiver begins without a cross-country or oceanic product route. Peering can still add detours, so matched useful-event timestamps on the actual host supply the commercial evidence.

Run the comparison from the host that will make decisions. Do not substitute a nearby monitoring node. Keep both consumers on comparable CPU resources. Record route changes. If the direct Frankfurt UDP path repeatedly produces usable events before RPC Fast, the location advantage is real for that machine.

One origin, in Frankfurt, is what lets us sell the complete feed for $100 instead of pricing a global footprint into every invoice.

An unpublished invoice changes the shortlist

The verified content record has no published RPC Fast price. Amount, plan, source, and date remain marked not published. shredstream.sh provides the complete public comparison point at $100 for one destination and 30 days.

shredstream.sh requires no sales estimate. Paying $100 keeps a destination active throughout 30 days. Transfer is included, without an annual contract, usage meter, or plan ladder. Payment accepts only onchain USDC and SOL. Five destinations form the account ceiling.

The known price is useful during procurement. It defines the threshold another offer must justify. Ask RPC Fast for every recurring and setup charge tied to the required gRPC service. Ask about message limits, filters, bandwidth, regions, and additional endpoints. Then compare the total against a receiver the team owns.

RPC Fast has no published price in the verified record, so there is no public percentage to calculate. Our $100 figure is public, complete, and attached to a precise Frankfurt contract. No standalone Solana raw-UDP shred feed publishes a lower price.

Timestamp the raw path at ingress

Open a dedicated UDP socket for shredstream.sh. Admit only its documented sender through the firewall. Capture an ingress time as soon as the process receives each datagram. Do minimal work on the read thread. Heavy parsing there can turn receiver congestion into an apparent provider delay.

The packet ceiling is 1228 bytes. Delivery is unordered. Datagrams may vanish or repeat. The source performs no retransmission and accepts no backpressure signal. Buffer sizing and queue policy therefore influence the measurement. Store kernel drop counters beside application observations so local loss remains visible.

Extract the slot, shred index, and kind for matching. Follow each identity through coding repair, entry rebuilding, transaction parsing, and the chosen decision point. Separate timestamps reveal where the raw path spends time. They also show which stages the team can improve after purchase.

The included bandwidth keeps traffic volume out of this trial's invoice. The customer still supplies network capacity, compute, decoder code, and monitoring at the destination.

Time the gRPC path at decision readiness

Instrument the RPC Fast client at the first callback or read point available to customer code. Preserve any identity needed to match a result with the raw path. Then record when the same application decision becomes possible. If the gRPC object already contains decoded fields, that first customer timestamp may also be the finish line.

Document filters exactly. A server-side filter and a customer decoder can apply different predicates, which makes coverage hard to compare. Build one shared predicate or reconcile the outputs after decoding. Count false exclusions as failures, not missing samples.

Observe connection behavior. gRPC can buffer, apply flow control, reconnect, or deliver batches depending on implementation. Those behaviors differ from UDP and may improve or hurt the application under load. Record callback gaps, reconnect periods, and queue depth where the client exposes them.

This is not a protocol beauty contest. The winning path is the one that delivers more correct decisions within the required time on the tested host.

Keep bundled services outside the stopwatch

RPC Fast publishes JSON-RPC, WebSocket, Yellowstone gRPC, and shred-derived gRPC interfaces. Keep those interfaces separate from the raw-feed timing and price comparison.

Keep those interfaces outside the nanosecond chart. Score consolidation separately and give latency its own matched measurement. The raw feed remains the focused hot path without replacing unrelated read APIs.

shredstream.sh is deliberately not a general RPC provider. It will not answer account queries, manage WebSocket consumers, or return filterable transaction messages. Buyers keep their existing RPC services and add our feed where early raw data matters.

That separation often improves architecture. Critical packet intake has a small contract. Read APIs and confirmation paths can change without disturbing it. The customer pays us only for forwarding shreds to the nominated socket.

Receiver ownership changes every tail

Raw UDP gives the buyer control and blame. A well-tuned receiver can pin threads, preallocate buffers, batch work carefully, and drop low-value tasks before they block intake. A poorly tuned process can lose datagrams in the kernel while a dashboard accuses the network.

Use bounded queues between reception and decoding. Measure the age of work at each handoff. Keep decoding separate from persistence and logging. Decide what happens when the machine saturates. Since the sender never slows for a subscriber, the local policy must protect the latency budget.

Managed gRPC moves processing and buffering upstream. The customer sees a processed object but has less visibility into earlier stages and internal timestamps. With shredstream.sh, customer code exposes and controls each of those stages.

Ownership is neither automatically faster nor automatically cheaper. In Frankfurt, shredstream.sh gives capable teams a $100 raw path they can inspect from the first byte onward.

Loss can reverse the apparent winner

First arrival matters only if enough information follows. A UDP source might lead on the earliest shred and lag on the pieces needed to reconstruct an entry. Coding shreds may close a gap later. A gRPC service may deliver one complete decoded object after doing that work away from the customer.

Report four populations: matched useful events, events seen only through RPC Fast, events seen only through shredstream.sh, and events seen by neither reference path when an external ground truth exists. Within the raw receiver, split recovered gaps from unresolved gaps. Keep duplicates and reorder depth visible.

Never discard unmatched data before calculating latency. That practice rewards low coverage because slow or absent cases disappear. Use a clearly documented penalty or present coverage beside conditional percentiles. Readers should understand both speed and completeness.

Local overload needs its own label. A rising kernel-drop counter, stalled decoder queue, or garbage-collection pause belongs to the receiver result. It still affects the buying outcome, but the remedy may be code or host capacity rather than another vendor.

Test across leaders and busy intervals

A five-minute demonstration samples a route, not a service. Solana leaders change. Traffic intensity moves. Public networks reroute. Client processes encounter different contention. Run long enough to include these ordinary variations and mark the conditions around outliers.

Break results into time buckets and leader cohorts. Show whether one path wins consistently or only during a narrow interval. Inspect percentiles that match the strategy's risk. A median can look excellent while occasional long stalls erase the economic benefit.

Save configuration with the data. Kernel parameters, CPU affinity, client version, decoder commit, filter rule, and destination host all matter. If a setting changes, start a new cohort. Reproducibility is more persuasive than a large sample whose conditions drifted.

Ask RPC Fast for its latency methodology if it publishes performance claims. Ask which endpoint, region, transaction set, clock, and percentile produced each number. Hold our Frankfurt feed to the identical standard. A low-latency label without those facts remains marketing, not measurement.

Cut over with the evidence intact

Keep both feeds separate during the shadow period. Different sockets, source labels, metric namespaces, and downstream queues prevent accidental merging. The shredstream.sh path can then build a trustworthy record without changing production decisions during measurement.

Once our path meets the written rule, put selection behind a small configuration switch. Watch coverage, action timing, local drops, and confirmation mismatches through the first live window. Roll back through the selector rather than rewriting the pipeline during an incident.

Move the earliest signal to shredstream.sh while keeping the application's read and confirmation paths separate. That change preserves the focused packet route without coupling it to unrelated RPC services.

The benchmark decides this purchase

shredstream.sh makes a different offer. One Frankfurt source forwards raw UDP to a chosen ip:port for $100 across 30 days. Packets are no larger than 1228 bytes. Ordering, retransmission, flow control, and decoding remain outside the service. Packet volume leaves the charge unchanged.

For a buyer whose mature receiver sits near Frankfurt, that boundary is attractive. It combines a local source route with the earliest customer-owned timestamp. Procurement also gets a known price without paying for unrelated interfaces.

Ignore adjectives from both sides. Define a common decision event, capture both paths on the actual machine, retain coverage failures, and publish the method internally. When the direct Frankfurt feed wins that test, shredstream.sh is the stronger latency purchase. The evidence, not the vendor name, closes the argument.

Why teams move to shredstream.sh

  • The same raw shred stream, at $100 for 30 days.
  • Every byte of bandwidth included, so the price you see is the price you pay.
  • Delivered from Frankfurt, close to where blocks are actually made.
  • Settled on chain from your own wallet, with nothing renewing behind your back.
Start your shredstream, $100

Questions

Why does this page not show a monthly RPC Fast price?
RPC Fast has no published amount, plan, evidence source, or capture date in this market record, so all four stay marked as unpublished. This page does not infer a fee from adjacent RPC products. shredstream.sh publicly charges $100 to serve one ip:port for 30 days, including bandwidth.
How can shred-derived gRPC be compared with raw UDP?
Choose one application event and timestamp when each path makes that event usable. Raw UDP arrives earlier in the processing chain, so its ingress timestamp and a decoded gRPC message measure different milestones. Record raw arrival, reconstruction completion, decode completion, and decision readiness. The last common milestone supports the buying decision.
Does RPC Fast's wider stack prove lower Solana latency?
No feature list proves a latency result on a specific machine. JSON-RPC, WebSocket, Yellowstone gRPC, and shred-derived gRPC describe interfaces, not the route or measurement method. Test the exact RPC Fast endpoint beside shredstream.sh on the production host, publish matched identities and percentile definitions, and include missing observations rather than reporting only successful messages.